- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- X50 2.0 vs Marauder 3
Acebeam X50 2.0 vs Olight Marauder 3
What X50 2.0 does better (2) and where Marauder 3 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.3Brightness & throw9.5
3.3Build & durability2.1
Why is X50 2.0 better than Marauder 3?
- Maximum output45,000 lm vs 25,000 lm+80%
- Weight756 g vs 840 g+11%
Why is Marauder 3 better than X50 2.0?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)977 m vs 1,000 m+2%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 45,000 lm | 25,000 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 238,632 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 977 m | 1,000 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Adjustable focus (zoom) | — | Yes |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Cree XHP70.3 HI | Cree XHP70.2 |
| LED maker | Cree | Cree |
| Colour temperature | 6,500K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | — | 46950 Li-ion |
| Number of batteries | — | 1 |
| Battery capacity | — | 31,900 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | — | 430 h |
| Rechargeable | — | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | — | Yes |
| Power bank function | Yes | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Submersible to | 2 m | — |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 139.6 mm | 152 mm |
| Head diameter / width | — | 75 mm |
| Weight | 756 g | 840 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Lockout | Yes | — |
