How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare791 models · updated Oct 21, 2026
  1. compoundsemi.com
  2. Compare
  3. X80GT 3 vs TK35R

Acebeam X80GT 3 vs Fenix TK35R

What X80GT 3 does better (1) and where TK35R wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Acebeam X80GT 3
Acebeam · 2026X80GT 3
8.0Score
1 advantage≈ $240
vs
Fenix TK35R
Fenix · 2025TK35R
8.8Score
4 advantages≈ $200
Higher score
8.3Brightness & throw8.8
4.8Battery & charging7.0
3.8Build & durability4.9
5.9Features5.9

Why is X80GT 3 better than TK35R?

  1. Maximum output30,000 lm vs 5,800 lm5.2×

Why is TK35R better than X80GT 3?

  1. Peak beam intensity46,220 cd vs 93,020 cd2×
  2. Beam distance (ANSI FL1)430 m vs 610 m+42%
  3. Weight560 g vs 342 g+64%
  4. Battery capacity3,000 mAh vs 4,000 mAh+33%
Specifications

Side by side

Acebeam X80GT 3Acebeam X80GT 3≈ $2408.0
Fenix TK35RFenix TK35R≈ $2008.8
Light output
Maximum output30,000 lm5,800 lm
Peak beam intensity46,220 cd93,020 cd
Beam distance (ANSI FL1)430 m610 m
Light sourceLEDLED
LED & beam
LED emitterNichia 519ALuminus SFT-25R
LED makerNichiaLuminus
Number of LEDs244
Colour rendering (CRI)95—
Colour temperature6,000K7,500K
Battery & charging
Battery18650 Li-ion18650 Li-ion
Battery capacity3,000 mAh4,000 mAh
Maximum runtime—105 h
RechargeableYesYes
USB-C chargingYesYes
Battery level indicator—Yes
Build & durability
Protection ratingIP68IP68
Water protection (IPx)IPx8IPx8
Impact resistance (drop)1 m—
Body material—Aluminium
Size & weight
Length / height128 mm154 mm
Head diameter / width—43 mm
Weight560 g342 g
Modes & features
Stepless (ramping) brightnessYes—
Switch—Dual switches
Strobe—Yes
Red lightYesYes
UV lightYesYes
Mode memory—Yes
Colours—Black
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare