- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- C7 V2.0 vs TK15R
Fenix C7 V2.0 vs Fenix TK15R
What C7 V2.0 does better (4) and where TK15R wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
C7 V2.0TK15R
| C7 V2.0 | TK15R | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 150.6 mm | 149 mm | +1.6 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 40 mm | 34 mm | +6 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 27.5 mm | 25.4 mm | +2.1 mm |
| Weight | 256 g | 206 g | +50 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is C7 V2.0 better than TK15R?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)575 m vs 490 m+17%
- Peak beam intensity82,660 cd vs 60,020 cd+38%
- Maximum output3,300 lm vs 3,200 lm+3%
- Maximum runtime79 h vs 68.3 h+16%
Why is TK15R better than C7 V2.0?
- Weight256 g vs 206 g+24%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 3,300 lm | 3,200 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 82,660 cd | 60,020 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 575 m | 490 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SFT-70 | Luminus SFT-70 |
| LED maker | Luminus | Luminus |
| Colour temperature | 6,500K | 7,200K |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 21700 Li-ion | 21700 Li-ion |
| Maximum runtime | 79 h | 68.3 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Magnetic tail / base | Yes | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 150.6 mm | 149 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 40 mm | 34 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 27.5 mm | 25.4 mm |
| Weight | 256 g | 206 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
| SOS / beacon | Yes | — |
| Lockout | Yes | Yes |
| Mode memory | Yes | Yes |
