- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- E03R vs E03R V2.0
Fenix E03R vs Fenix E03R V2.0
What E03R does better (1) and where E03R V2.0 wins (5) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
E03RE03R V2.0
| E03R | E03R V2.0 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 47 mm | 52.5 mm | −5.5 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 24 mm | 26 mm | −2 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 12 mm | 13 mm | −1 mm |
| Weight | 22 g | 30 g | −8 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is E03R better than E03R V2.0?
- Weight22 g vs 30 g+36%
Why is E03R V2.0 better than E03R?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)42 m vs 90 m2.1×
- Maximum output260 lm vs 500 lm+92%
- Peak beam intensity440 cd vs 2,020 cd4.6×
- Battery capacity200 mAh vs 400 mAh2×
- Maximum runtime18 h vs 30 h+67%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 260 lm | 500 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 440 cd | 2,020 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 42 m | 90 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| Number of LEDs | — | 2 |
| Colour temperature | — | 6,500K |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | — | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Battery capacity | 200 mAh | 400 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 18 h | 30 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP66 | IP66 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx6 | IPx6 |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 47 mm | 52.5 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 24 mm | 26 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 12 mm | 13 mm |
| Weight | 22 g | 30 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 4 | — |
| Red light | Yes | Yes |
| Green / blue / RGB light | — | Yes |
| Lockout | — | Yes |
| Mode memory | — | Yes |
