- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- E12 V2.0 vs Thumb
Fenix E12 V2.0 vs Nitecore Thumb
What E12 V2.0 does better (4) and where Thumb wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
E12 V2.0Thumb
| E12 V2.0 | Thumb | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 76.6 mm | 74 mm | +2.6 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 19 mm | 24 mm | −5 mm |
| Weight | 27 g | 25 g | +2 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is E12 V2.0 better than Thumb?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)68 m vs 26 m2.6×
- Maximum output160 lm vs 85 lm+88%
- Maximum runtime70 h vs 22 h3.2×
- Water protection (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
Why is Thumb better than E12 V2.0?
- Weight27 g vs 25 g+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 160 lm | 85 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 1,160 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 68 m | 26 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| Number of LEDs | — | 2 |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | AA | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Maximum runtime | 70 h | 22 h |
| Rechargeable | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx4 |
| Body material | — | Plastic / polymer |
| Pocket clip | Yes | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 76.6 mm | 74 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 19 mm | 24 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 17.6 mm | — |
| Weight | 27 g | 25 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 3 | — |
| Switch | Tail switch | — |
| Red light | — | Yes |
| Colours | — | Black |
