- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- E12 V2.0 vs i1R 2 EOS
Fenix E12 V2.0 vs Olight i1R 2 EOS
What E12 V2.0 does better (2) and where i1R 2 EOS wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
E12 V2.0i1R 2 EOS
| E12 V2.0 | i1R 2 EOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 76.6 mm | 44 mm | +32.6 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 19 mm | 14 mm | +5 mm |
| Weight | 27 g | 14 g | +13 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is E12 V2.0 better than i1R 2 EOS?
- Maximum runtime70 h vs 6 h11.7×
- Maximum output160 lm vs 150 lm+7%
Why is i1R 2 EOS better than E12 V2.0?
- Weight27 g vs 14 g+93%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 160 lm | 150 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 1,160 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 68 m | — |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| Number of LEDs | — | 1 |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | AA | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Maximum runtime | 70 h | 6 h |
| Rechargeable | — | Yes |
| Charging time | — | 1.2 h |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Pocket clip | Yes | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 76.6 mm | 44 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 19 mm | 14 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 17.6 mm | — |
| Weight | 27 g | 14 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 3 | — |
| Switch | Tail switch | — |
