- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- E28R V2.0 vs PD35 V3.0
Fenix E28R V2.0 vs Fenix PD35 V3.0
What E28R V2.0 does better (1) and where PD35 V3.0 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
E28R V2.0PD35 V3.0
| E28R V2.0 | PD35 V3.0 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 121 mm | 134 mm | −13 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 26.5 mm | 25.4 mm | +1.1 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 22.5 mm | 22.8 mm | −0.3 mm |
| Weight | 128 g | 84 g | +44 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is E28R V2.0 better than PD35 V3.0?
- Maximum runtime260 h vs 230 h+13%
Why is PD35 V3.0 better than E28R V2.0?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)273 m vs 357 m+31%
- Peak beam intensity18,630 cd vs 31,860 cd+71%
- Weight128 g vs 84 g+52%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,700 lm | 1,700 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 18,630 cd | 31,860 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 273 m | 357 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SST-40 | Luminus SFT-40 |
| LED maker | Luminus | Luminus |
| Number of LEDs | — | 1 |
| Colour temperature | 6,500K | 6,000K |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 18650 Li-ion, CR123A | 18650 Li-ion, CR123A |
| Battery capacity | 3,400 mAh | — |
| Maximum runtime | 260 h | 230 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Magnetic tail / base | Yes | — |
| Pocket clip | Yes | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 121 mm | 134 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 26.5 mm | 25.4 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 22.5 mm | 22.8 mm |
| Weight | 128 g | 84 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | — | 5 |
| Switch | Side switch | Dual switches |
| Tactical tail switch (momentary on) | — | Yes |
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
| Lockout | Yes | — |
| Mode memory | Yes | Yes |
