- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- E28R V2.0 vs TK11 TAC
Fenix E28R V2.0 vs Fenix TK11 TAC
What E28R V2.0 does better (2) and where TK11 TAC wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
E28R V2.0TK11 TAC
| E28R V2.0 | TK11 TAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 121 mm | 140 mm | −19 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 26.5 mm | 34 mm | −7.5 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 22.5 mm | 23.5 mm | −1 mm |
| Weight | 128 g | 114 g | +14 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is E28R V2.0 better than TK11 TAC?
- Maximum runtime260 h vs 47.5 h5.5×
- Maximum output1,700 lm vs 1,600 lm+6%
Why is TK11 TAC better than E28R V2.0?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)273 m vs 335 m+23%
- Peak beam intensity18,630 cd vs 28,060 cd+51%
- Weight128 g vs 114 g+12%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,700 lm | 1,600 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 18,630 cd | 28,060 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 273 m | 335 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SST-40 | Luminus SST-40 |
| LED maker | Luminus | Luminus |
| Colour temperature | 6,500K | 6,500K |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 18650 Li-ion, CR123A | 18650 Li-ion, CR123A |
| Battery capacity | 3,400 mAh | — |
| Maximum runtime | 260 h | 47.5 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | — |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Magnetic tail / base | Yes | — |
| Pocket clip | Yes | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 121 mm | 140 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 26.5 mm | 34 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 22.5 mm | 23.5 mm |
| Weight | 128 g | 114 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | — | 3 |
| Switch | Side switch | Tail switch |
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
| Lockout | Yes | — |
| Mode memory | Yes | — |
