How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare791 models · updated Oct 21, 2026
  1. compoundsemi.com
  2. Compare
  3. E35 V3.0 vs MH10 V2

Fenix E35 V3.0 vs Nitecore MH10 V2

What E35 V3.0 does better (4) and where MH10 V2 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Fenix E35 V3.0
Fenix · 2020E35 V3.0
8.6Score
4 advantages≈ $75
Higher score
vs
Nitecore MH10 V2
Nitecore · 2020MH10 V2
6.6Score
1 advantage≈ $65
5.3Brightness & throw3.9
5.7Battery & charging8.6
9.6Build & durability7.8
5.9Features5.9

Why is E35 V3.0 better than MH10 V2?

  1. Maximum output3,000 lm vs 1,200 lm2.5×
  2. Beam distance (ANSI FL1)240 m vs 201 m+19%
  3. Peak beam intensity14,400 cd vs 10,100 cd+43%
  4. Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 4,000 mAh+25%

Why is MH10 V2 better than E35 V3.0?

  1. Maximum runtime50 h vs 1,488 h29.8×
Specifications

Side by side

Fenix E35 V3.0Fenix E35 V3.0≈ $758.6
Light output
Maximum output3,000 lm1,200 lm
Peak beam intensity14,400 cd10,100 cd
Beam distance (ANSI FL1)240 m201 m
Light sourceLEDLED
LED & beam
LED emitterLuminus SST-70—
LED makerLuminus—
Battery & charging
Battery21700 Li-ion21700 Li-ion
Battery capacity5,000 mAh4,000 mAh
Maximum runtime50 h1,488 h
RechargeableYesYes
USB-C chargingYesYes
Battery level indicatorYes—
Also runs on AA/AAA/CR123A—Yes
Build & durability
Protection rating—IPX8
Water protection (IPx)—IPx8
Body material—Aluminium
Pocket clip—Yes
Size & weight
Length / height118 mm—
Weight67 g—
Modes & features
Brightness levels5—
SwitchSide switch—
StrobeYesYes
SOS / beacon—Yes
Mode memory—Yes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare