- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- GL19R V2.0 vs WL13
Fenix GL19R V2.0 vs Nextorch WL13
What GL19R V2.0 does better (2) and where WL13 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.0Brightness & throw6.8
3.7Build & durability5.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
GL19R V2.0WL13
| GL19R V2.0 | WL13 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 94 mm | 82 mm | +12 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 31 mm | 39 mm | −8 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 32 mm | 36 mm | −4 mm |
| Weight | 119 g | 89 g | +30 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is GL19R V2.0 better than WL13?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)420 m vs 180 m2.3×
- Peak beam intensity44,100 cd vs 8,100 cd5.4×
Why is WL13 better than GL19R V2.0?
- Maximum output1,200 lm vs 1,300 lm+8%
- Weight119 g vs 89 g+34%
- Water protection (IPx)IPx6 vs IPx7+17%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,200 lm | 1,300 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 44,100 cd | 8,100 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 420 m | 180 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SFT-25R | — |
| LED maker | Luminus | — |
| Colour temperature | 6,000K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 18350 Li-ion | 16340 / RCR123A Li-ion, CR123A |
| Maximum runtime | 0.9 h | — |
| Rechargeable | Yes | — |
| USB-C charging | Yes | — |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP66 | IPX7 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx6 | IPx7 |
| Submersible to | — | 1 m |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 94 mm | 82 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 31 mm | 39 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 32 mm | 36 mm |
| Weight | 119 g | 89 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | — | Remote pressure switch |
| Tactical tail switch (momentary on) | — | Yes |
