- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- HP25R V2.0 vs HC65 UHE
Fenix HP25R V2.0 vs Nitecore HC65 UHE
What HP25R V2.0 does better (3) and where HC65 UHE wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.8Brightness & throw8.8
9.2Battery & charging6.9
4.6Build & durability7.4
8.7Light quality8.2
5.9Features5.9
Why is HP25R V2.0 better than HC65 UHE?
- Maximum runtime400 h vs 82 h4.9×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)228 m vs 222 m+3%
- Peak beam intensity13,000 cd vs 12,293 cd+6%
Why is HC65 UHE better than HP25R V2.0?
- Maximum output1,600 lm vs 2,000 lm+25%
- Weight238 g vs 152 g+57%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,600 lm | 2,000 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 13,000 cd | 12,293 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 228 m | 222 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SST-40 | — |
| LED maker | Luminus | — |
| Number of LEDs | — | 8 |
| Colour rendering (CRI) | — | 90 |
| Colour temperature | 5,700K | — |
| Adjustable colour temperature | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 21700 Li-ion, 18650 Li-ion | 18650 Li-ion |
| Battery capacity | — | 4,000 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 400 h | 82 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | — | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | — | 2 m |
| Impact resistance (drop) | 2 m | 2 m |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 60 mm | — |
| Head diameter / width | 47 mm | — |
| Body diameter / depth | 33 mm | — |
| Weight | 238 g | 152 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 5 | — |
| Switch | Dual switches | — |
| Strobe | — | Yes |
| SOS / beacon | Yes | Yes |
| Red light | Yes | Yes |
| Lockout | Yes | Yes |
| Mode memory | Yes | — |
