- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- HP25R V2.0 vs Nao RL
Fenix HP25R V2.0 vs Petzl Nao RL
What HP25R V2.0 does better (4) and where Nao RL wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.8Brightness & throw8.5
9.2Battery & charging6.2
8.7Light quality5.7
5.9Features5.9
Why is HP25R V2.0 better than Nao RL?
- Maximum runtime400 h vs 80 h5×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)228 m vs 200 m+14%
- Maximum output1,600 lm vs 1,500 lm+7%
- Peak beam intensity13,000 cd vs 10,000 cd+30%
Why is Nao RL better than HP25R V2.0?
- Weight238 g vs 145 g+64%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,600 lm | 1,500 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 13,000 cd | 10,000 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 228 m | 200 m |
| Runtime at maximum output | — | 1,440 min |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Adjustable focus (zoom) | — | Yes |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SST-40 | — |
| LED maker | Luminus | — |
| Colour temperature | 5,700K | — |
| Adjustable colour temperature | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 21700 Li-ion, 18650 Li-ion | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Battery capacity | — | 3,200 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 400 h | 80 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | — |
| Charging time | — | 3.5 h |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Impact resistance (drop) | 2 m | — |
| Body material | Aluminium | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 60 mm | — |
| Head diameter / width | 47 mm | — |
| Body diameter / depth | 33 mm | — |
| Weight | 238 g | 145 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 5 | — |
| Switch | Dual switches | — |
| Strobe | — | Yes |
| SOS / beacon | Yes | — |
| Red light | Yes | Yes |
| Motion / reactive sensor | — | Yes |
| Lockout | Yes | — |
| Mode memory | Yes | — |
| Colours | — | Black |
