- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- HT18 vs TK35
Fenix HT18 vs Fenix TK35
What HT18 does better (4) and where TK35 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
HT18TK35
| HT18 | TK35 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 184 mm | 159.5 mm | +24.5 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 68 mm | 48 mm | +20 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 26 mm | 43 mm | −17 mm |
| Weight | 220 g | 272 g | −52 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is HT18 better than TK35?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)925 m vs 480 m+93%
- Peak beam intensity213,910 cd vs 57,600 cd3.7×
- Maximum output1,500 lm vs 1,300 lm+15%
- Weight220 g vs 272 g+24%
Why is TK35 better than HT18?
- Maximum runtime61 h vs 235 h3.9×
- Brightness levels4 vs 5+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,500 lm | 1,300 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 213,910 cd | 57,600 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 925 m | 480 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SFT-40 | Cree XHP35 HI |
| LED maker | Luminus | Cree |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 21700 Li-ion, 18650 Li-ion | 18650 Li-ion, AAA |
| Maximum runtime | 61 h | 235 h |
| Rechargeable | — | Yes |
| USB-C charging | — | No |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 184 mm | 159.5 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 68 mm | 48 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 26 mm | 43 mm |
| Weight | 220 g | 272 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 4 | 5 |
| Switch | — | Dual switches |
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
| SOS / beacon | — | Yes |
