- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- HT18R V2.0 vs HT32R
Fenix HT18R V2.0 vs Fenix HT32R
What HT18R V2.0 does better (3) and where HT32R wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.2Brightness & throw9.0
8.4Battery & charging8.4
4.8Build & durability5.7
5.9Features5.9
Why is HT18R V2.0 better than HT32R?
- Peak beam intensity302,500 cd vs 136,900 cd2.2×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)1,100 m vs 740 m+49%
- Battery capacity6,000 mAh vs 5,500 mAh+9%
Why is HT32R better than HT18R V2.0?
- Maximum output3,700 lm vs 4,000 lm+8%
- Weight358 g vs 259 g+38%
- Maximum runtime87 h vs 92.5 h+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 3,700 lm | 4,000 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 302,500 cd | 136,900 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 1,100 m | 740 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SFT-90 | Luminus SFT-42R |
| LED maker | Luminus | Luminus |
| Number of LEDs | — | 4 |
| Colour temperature | 6,500K | 6,500K |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 21700 Li-ion | 21700 Li-ion |
| Battery capacity | 6,000 mAh | 5,500 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 87 h | 92.5 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | 1.5 m | — |
| Body material | Aluminium | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | — | 164.8 mm |
| Head diameter / width | — | 61 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | — | 28.5 mm |
| Weight | 358 g | 259 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | Side switch | Rotary / scroll wheel |
| Strobe | Yes | — |
| SOS / beacon | Yes | — |
| Red light | — | Yes |
| Green / blue / RGB light | — | Yes |
| Lockout | Yes | Yes |
| Mode memory | Yes | Yes |
| Colours | Black | — |
