How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare791 models · updated Oct 21, 2026
  1. compoundsemi.com
  2. Compare
  3. HT18R V2.0 vs E1

Fenix HT18R V2.0 vs Wuben E1

What HT18R V2.0 does better (3) and where E1 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Fenix HT18R V2.0
Fenix · 2025HT18R V2.0
8.8Score
3 advantages≈ $150
Higher score
vs
Wuben E1
Wuben · 2024E1
5.2Score
1 advantage≈ $150
8.9Brightness & throw2.9
8.4Battery & charging7.7
4.3Build & durability5.4

Why is HT18R V2.0 better than E1?

  1. Maximum output3,700 lm vs 500 lm7.4×
  2. Water protection (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx5+60%
  3. Maximum runtime87 h vs 70 h+24%

Why is E1 better than HT18R V2.0?

  1. Weight358 g vs 38 g9.4×
Specifications

Side by side

Fenix HT18R V2.0Fenix HT18R V2.0≈ $1508.8
Wuben E1Wuben E1≈ $1505.2
Light output
Maximum output3,700 lm500 lm
Peak beam intensity302,500 cd—
Beam distance (ANSI FL1)1,100 m—
Light sourceLEDLED
LED & beam
LED emitterLuminus SFT-90—
LED makerLuminus—
Colour temperature6,500K3,000K
Adjustable colour temperature—Yes
Battery & charging
Battery21700 Li-ion—
Battery capacity6,000 mAh—
Maximum runtime87 h70 h
RechargeableYesYes
USB-C chargingYesYes
Charging time—0.8 h
Battery level indicatorYes—
Build & durability
Protection ratingIP68IP65
Water protection (IPx)IPx8IPx5
Submersible to1.5 m—
Impact resistance (drop)—1.5 m
Body materialAluminium—
Size & weight
Weight358 g38 g
Modes & features
SwitchSide switch—
StrobeYes—
SOS / beaconYes—
LockoutYes—
Mode memoryYes—
ColoursBlack—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare