- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- LD22 V2.0 vs E52C
Fenix LD22 V2.0 vs Nextorch E52C
What LD22 V2.0 does better (3) and where E52C wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
LD22 V2.0E52C
| LD22 V2.0 | E52C | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 148 mm | 153 mm | −5 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 21 mm | 30 mm | −9 mm |
| Weight | 96 g | 130 g | −34 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is LD22 V2.0 better than E52C?
- Maximum runtime220 h vs 65 h3.4×
- Weight96 g vs 130 g+35%
- Peak beam intensity11,450 cd vs 11,025 cd+4%
Why is E52C better than LD22 V2.0?
- Maximum output800 lm vs 3,000 lm3.8×
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 800 lm | 3,000 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 11,450 cd | 11,025 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 214 m | 210 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SST-20 | — |
| LED maker | Luminus | — |
| Colour temperature | 6,000K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | AA | 21700 Li-ion |
| Maximum runtime | 220 h | 65 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Also runs on AA/AAA/CR123A | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IPX8 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | 2 m | — |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Pocket clip | Yes | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 148 mm | 153 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 21 mm | 30 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 18 mm | — |
| Weight | 96 g | 130 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 5 | — |
| Strobe | Yes | — |
| SOS / beacon | Yes | — |
| Red light | Yes | — |
| Green / blue / RGB light | Yes | — |
| Mode memory | Yes | — |
| Colours | Black | — |
