- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- E52C vs Taschenlampe 3315 138
Nextorch E52C vs Peli Taschenlampe 3315 138
What E52C does better (2) and where Taschenlampe 3315 138 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.6Brightness & throw2.7
Why is E52C better than Taschenlampe 3315 138?
- Maximum output3,000 lm vs 138 lm21.7×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)210 m vs 146 m+44%
Why is Taschenlampe 3315 138 better than E52C?
Taschenlampe 3315 138 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 3,000 lm | 138 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 11,025 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 210 m | 146 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 21700 Li-ion | AA |
| Number of batteries | — | 3 |
| Maximum runtime | 65 h | — |
| Rechargeable | Yes | — |
| USB-C charging | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IPX8 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Body material | Aluminium | Plastic / polymer |
| Pocket clip | Yes | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 153 mm | — |
| Head diameter / width | 30 mm | — |
| Weight | 130 g | — |
| Modes & features | ||
| Colours | — | Yellow |
