- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- LR40R V2.0 vs TM12K
Fenix LR40R V2.0 vs Nitecore TM12K
What LR40R V2.0 does better (2) and where TM12K wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.3Brightness & throw9.5
8.4Battery & charging8.5
4.9Build & durability6.0
Why is LR40R V2.0 better than TM12K?
- Maximum output15,000 lm vs 12,000 lm+25%
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 4,800 mAh+4%
Why is TM12K better than LR40R V2.0?
- Weight842 g vs 233 g3.6×
- Maximum runtime177 h vs 200 h+13%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 15,000 lm | 12,000 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 202,500 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 900 m | — |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SFT-70 | Cree XHP50 |
| LED maker | Luminus | Cree |
| Number of LEDs | 6 | 6 |
| Colour temperature | 6,000K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po | 21700 Li-ion |
| Number of batteries | 3 | 1 |
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 4,800 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 177 h | 200 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Charging time | — | 1.5 h |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | Yes |
| Power bank function | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | — | 2 m |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 175 mm | 108 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 82 mm | — |
| Body diameter / depth | 55 mm | — |
| Weight | 842 g | 233 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 16 | — |
| Switch | Rotary / scroll wheel | Tail switch |
| Strobe | Yes | — |
| SOS / beacon | Yes | — |
| Mode memory | Yes | — |
| Colours | Black | Black |
