- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- LR40R V2.0 vs E7
Fenix LR40R V2.0 vs Wuben E7
What LR40R V2.0 does better (4) and where E7 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.1Brightness & throw6.8
8.4Battery & charging8.0
4.2Build & durability8.8
9.8Light quality9.7
5.9Features5.9
Why is LR40R V2.0 better than E7?
- Maximum output15,000 lm vs 1,800 lm8.3×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)900 m vs 132 m6.8×
- Peak beam intensity202,500 cd vs 4,360 cd46.4×
- Brightness levels16 vs 62.7×
Why is E7 better than LR40R V2.0?
E7 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 15,000 lm | 1,800 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 202,500 cd | 4,360 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 900 m | 132 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SFT-70 | — |
| LED maker | Luminus | Osram |
| Number of LEDs | 6 | 6 |
| Colour temperature | 6,000K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po | 18650 Li-ion, 18350 Li-ion |
| Number of batteries | 3 | — |
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | — |
| Maximum runtime | 177 h | 180 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Power bank function | Yes | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | — | 2 m |
| Body material | Aluminium | — |
| Magnetic tail / base | — | Yes |
| Pocket clip | — | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 175 mm | — |
| Head diameter / width | 82 mm | — |
| Body diameter / depth | 55 mm | — |
| Weight | 842 g | — |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 16 | 6 |
| Switch | Rotary / scroll wheel | — |
| Strobe | Yes | — |
| SOS / beacon | Yes | — |
| Mode memory | Yes | — |
| Colours | Black | Black |
