- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- LR50R V2.0 vs TAC7R
Fenix LR50R V2.0 vs Ledlenser TAC7R
What LR50R V2.0 does better (3) and where TAC7R wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.2Brightness & throw6.7
4.2Build & durability7.8
5.9Features5.9
Why is LR50R V2.0 better than TAC7R?
- Maximum output18,000 lm vs 3,200 lm5.6×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)846 m vs 369 m2.3×
- Peak beam intensity178,930 cd vs 34,000 cd5.3×
Why is TAC7R better than LR50R V2.0?
TAC7R has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 18,000 lm | 3,200 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 178,930 cd | 34,000 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 846 m | 369 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SST-70 | — |
| LED maker | Luminus | — |
| Number of LEDs | 6 | — |
| Colour temperature | 6,500K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 46950 Li-ion | 21700 Li-ion |
| Battery capacity | 32,000 mAh | — |
| Maximum runtime | 195 h | — |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Power bank function | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 217.6 mm | — |
| Head diameter / width | 89.6 mm | — |
| Body diameter / depth | 53.9 mm | — |
| Weight | 1,150 g | — |
| Modes & features | ||
| Stepless (ramping) brightness | Yes | — |
| Switch | Rotary / scroll wheel | — |
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
| SOS / beacon | Yes | — |
| Red light | Yes | Yes |
| UV light | Yes | — |
| Green / blue / RGB light | — | Yes |
| Lockout | Yes | — |
| Mode memory | Yes | — |
| Colours | — | Black |
