- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- PD35 V2.0 vs UC35 V2.0
Fenix PD35 V2.0 vs Fenix UC35 V2.0
What PD35 V2.0 does better (0) and where UC35 V2.0 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
PD35 V2.0UC35 V2.0
| PD35 V2.0 | UC35 V2.0 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 138 mm | 140 mm | −2 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 25.4 mm | 25.4 mm | = |
| Body diameter / depth | 23 mm | 23.5 mm | −0.5 mm |
| Weight | 88 g | 88 g | = |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is PD35 V2.0 better than UC35 V2.0?
PD35 V2.0 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is UC35 V2.0 better than PD35 V2.0?
- Maximum runtime430 h vs 750 h+74%
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)250 m vs 266 m+6%
- Peak beam intensity15,620 cd vs 17,690 cd+13%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,000 lm | 1,000 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 15,620 cd | 17,690 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 250 m | 266 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Cree XP-L HI | Cree XP-L HI |
| LED maker | Cree | Cree |
| Colour temperature | — | 5,700K |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | — | 18650 Li-ion, CR123A, AAA |
| Battery capacity | — | 3,400 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 430 h | 750 h |
| Rechargeable | — | Yes |
| USB-C charging | — | No |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | Yes |
| Also runs on AA/AAA/CR123A | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Pocket clip | — | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 138 mm | 140 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 25.4 mm | 25.4 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 23 mm | 23.5 mm |
| Weight | 88 g | 88 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 5 | — |
| Switch | Dual switches | Dual switches |
| Tactical tail switch (momentary on) | — | Yes |
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
| Mode memory | — | Yes |
