- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- PD35 V2.0 vs MH12 V2.0
Fenix PD35 V2.0 vs Nitecore MH12 V2.0
What PD35 V2.0 does better (1) and where MH12 V2.0 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
PD35 V2.0MH12 V2.0
| PD35 V2.0 | MH12 V2.0 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 138 mm | 158 mm | −20 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 25.4 mm | 25 mm | +0.4 mm |
| Weight | 88 g | 84 g | +4 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is PD35 V2.0 better than MH12 V2.0?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)250 m vs 202 m+24%
Why is MH12 V2.0 better than PD35 V2.0?
- Maximum runtime430 h vs 1,500 h3.5×
- Maximum output1,000 lm vs 1,200 lm+20%
- Weight88 g vs 84 g+5%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,000 lm | 1,200 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 15,620 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 250 m | 202 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Cree XP-L HI | — |
| LED maker | Cree | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | — | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Maximum runtime | 430 h | 1,500 h |
| Rechargeable | — | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 138 mm | 158 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 25.4 mm | 25 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 23 mm | — |
| Weight | 88 g | 84 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 5 | — |
| Switch | Dual switches | — |
| Strobe | Yes | — |
