- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- PD36 TAC vs TK11 TAC
Fenix PD36 TAC vs Fenix TK11 TAC
What PD36 TAC does better (3) and where TK11 TAC wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
PD36 TACTK11 TAC
| PD36 TAC | TK11 TAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 140 mm | 140 mm | = |
| Head diameter / width | 26.5 mm | 34 mm | −7.5 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 25.4 mm | 23.5 mm | +1.9 mm |
| Weight | 92 g | 114 g | −22 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is PD36 TAC better than TK11 TAC?
- Maximum output3,000 lm vs 1,600 lm+88%
- Weight92 g vs 114 g+24%
- Brightness levels5 vs 3+67%
Why is TK11 TAC better than PD36 TAC?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)274 m vs 335 m+22%
- Peak beam intensity18,770 cd vs 28,060 cd+49%
- Maximum runtime43.2 h vs 47.5 h+10%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 3,000 lm | 1,600 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 18,770 cd | 28,060 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 274 m | 335 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SST-70 | Luminus SST-40 |
| LED maker | Luminus | Luminus |
| Colour temperature | 6,000K | 6,500K |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 21700 Li-ion | 18650 Li-ion, CR123A |
| Maximum runtime | 43.2 h | 47.5 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Body material | Aluminium | — |
| Pocket clip | Yes | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 140 mm | 140 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 26.5 mm | 34 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 25.4 mm | 23.5 mm |
| Weight | 92 g | 114 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 5 | 3 |
| Switch | Rotary / scroll wheel | Tail switch |
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
| Lockout | Yes | — |
| Colours | Black | — |
