- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- PD36 TAC vs TK16 V2.0
Fenix PD36 TAC vs Fenix TK16 V2.0
What PD36 TAC does better (1) and where TK16 V2.0 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
PD36 TACTK16 V2.0
| PD36 TAC | TK16 V2.0 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 140 mm | 143 mm | −3 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 26.5 mm | 34 mm | −7.5 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 25.4 mm | 25.4 mm | = |
| Weight | 92 g | 112 g | −20 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is PD36 TAC better than TK16 V2.0?
- Weight92 g vs 112 g+22%
Why is TK16 V2.0 better than PD36 TAC?
- Peak beam intensity18,770 cd vs 36,100 cd+92%
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)274 m vs 380 m+39%
- Maximum output3,000 lm vs 3,100 lm+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 3,000 lm | 3,100 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 18,770 cd | 36,100 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 274 m | 380 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SST-70 | Luminus SST-70 |
| LED maker | Luminus | Luminus |
| Colour temperature | 6,000K | 6,200K |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 21700 Li-ion | 21700 Li-ion |
| Battery capacity | — | 5,000 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 43.2 h | 43.3 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Body material | Aluminium | — |
| Pocket clip | Yes | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 140 mm | 143 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 26.5 mm | 34 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 25.4 mm | 25.4 mm |
| Weight | 92 g | 112 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 5 | — |
| Switch | Rotary / scroll wheel | Dual switches |
| Tactical tail switch (momentary on) | — | Yes |
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
| Lockout | Yes | — |
| Mode memory | — | Yes |
| Colours | Black | — |
