- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- PD40R V2.0 vs TK22 V2.0
Fenix PD40R V2.0 vs Fenix TK22 V2.0
What PD40R V2.0 does better (3) and where TK22 V2.0 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.1Brightness & throw6.3
7.2Battery & charging7.1
8.3Build & durability6.0
3.5Light quality3.5
5.9Features5.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
PD40R V2.0TK22 V2.0
| PD40R V2.0 | TK22 V2.0 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 138 mm | 150 mm | −12 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 33.2 mm | 40 mm | −6.8 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 26 mm | 25.4 mm | +0.6 mm |
| Weight | 116 g | 150 g | −34 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is PD40R V2.0 better than TK22 V2.0?
- Maximum output3,000 lm vs 1,600 lm+88%
- Weight116 g vs 150 g+29%
- Maximum runtime88.2 h vs 80 h+10%
Why is TK22 V2.0 better than PD40R V2.0?
TK22 V2.0 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 3,000 lm | 1,600 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 41,010 cd | 41,010 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 405 m | 405 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SST-70 | Luminus SST-40 |
| LED maker | Luminus | Luminus |
| Colour temperature | — | 6,500K |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 21700 Li-ion, 18650 Li-ion | 21700 Li-ion, 18650 Li-ion |
| Maximum runtime | 88.2 h | 80 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | — |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Submersible to | 2 m | — |
| Pocket clip | — | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 138 mm | 150 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 33.2 mm | 40 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 26 mm | 25.4 mm |
| Weight | 116 g | 150 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 4 | 4 |
| Switch | Rotary / scroll wheel | Dual switches |
| Tactical tail switch (momentary on) | — | Yes |
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
