- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- TK11 TAC vs MH10 V2.0
Fenix TK11 TAC vs Nitecore MH10 V2.0
What TK11 TAC does better (2) and where MH10 V2.0 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
TK11 TACMH10 V2.0
| TK11 TAC | MH10 V2.0 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 140 mm | 130 mm | +10 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 34 mm | 25 mm | +9 mm |
| Weight | 114 g | 75 g | +39 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is TK11 TAC better than MH10 V2.0?
- Maximum output1,600 lm vs 1,000 lm+60%
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)335 m vs 232 m+44%
Why is MH10 V2.0 better than TK11 TAC?
- Maximum runtime47.5 h vs 520 h10.9×
- Weight114 g vs 75 g+52%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,600 lm | 1,000 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 28,060 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 335 m | 232 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SST-40 | — |
| LED maker | Luminus | — |
| Colour temperature | 6,500K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 18650 Li-ion, CR123A | 18650 Li-ion, CR123A |
| Maximum runtime | 47.5 h | 520 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | — | 2 m |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 140 mm | 130 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 34 mm | 25 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 23.5 mm | — |
| Weight | 114 g | 75 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 3 | — |
| Switch | Tail switch | — |
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
| SOS / beacon | — | Yes |
| Colours | — | Black |
