How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare791 models · updated Oct 21, 2026
  1. compoundsemi.com
  2. Compare
  3. TK16 V2.0 vs DM35

Fenix TK16 V2.0 vs Imalent DM35

What TK16 V2.0 does better (2) and where DM35 wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Fenix TK16 V2.0
Fenix · 2021TK16 V2.0
8.0Score
2 advantages≈ $100
vs
Imalent DM35
Imalent · 2019DM35
8.6Score
4 advantages≈ $95
Higher score
6.9Brightness & throw6.9
5.4Battery & charging6.9
8.5Build & durability8.5
5.9Features5.9

Why is TK16 V2.0 better than DM35?

  1. Maximum output3,100 lm vs 2,000 lm+55%
  2. USB-C chargingYes · DM35: No

Why is DM35 better than TK16 V2.0?

  1. Maximum runtime43.3 h vs 192 h4.4×
  2. Beam distance (ANSI FL1)380 m vs 450 m+18%
  3. Peak beam intensity36,100 cd vs 50,960 cd+41%
  4. Weight112 g vs 87 g+29%
Specifications

Side by side

Fenix TK16 V2.0Fenix TK16 V2.0≈ $1008.0
Imalent DM35Imalent DM35≈ $958.6
Light output
Maximum output3,100 lm2,000 lm
Peak beam intensity36,100 cd50,960 cd
Beam distance (ANSI FL1)380 m450 m
Light sourceLEDLED
LED & beam
LED emitterLuminus SST-70Cree XHP
LED makerLuminusCree
Colour temperature6,200K—
Battery & charging
Battery21700 Li-ion21700 Li-ion, AAA
Battery capacity5,000 mAh5,000 mAh
Maximum runtime43.3 h192 h
RechargeableYesYes
USB-C chargingYesNo
Build & durability
Protection ratingIP68—
Water protection (IPx)IPx8—
Submersible to—2 m
Impact resistance (drop)—1.5 m
Body material—Aluminium
Magnetic tail / base—Yes
Pocket clip—Yes
Can tail-stand—Yes
Size & weight
Length / height143 mm—
Head diameter / width34 mm—
Body diameter / depth25.4 mm—
Weight112 g87 g
Modes & features
SwitchDual switches—
Tactical tail switch (momentary on)Yes—
StrobeYes—
Red light—Yes
Mode memoryYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare