- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- TK16 V2.0 vs DN35
Fenix TK16 V2.0 vs Imalent DN35
What TK16 V2.0 does better (3) and where DN35 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Why is TK16 V2.0 better than DN35?
- Maximum output3,100 lm vs 2,200 lm+41%
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 4,500 mAh+11%
- Weight112 g vs 115 g+3%
Why is DN35 better than TK16 V2.0?
- Peak beam intensity36,100 cd vs 88,800 cd2.5×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)380 m vs 596 m+57%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 3,100 lm | 2,200 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 36,100 cd | 88,800 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 380 m | 596 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SST-70 | Cree XHP35 HI |
| LED maker | Luminus | Cree |
| Number of LEDs | 1 | — |
| Colour temperature | 6,200K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 21700 Li-ion | 26650 Li-ion |
| Number of batteries | 1 | — |
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 4,500 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 43.3 h | — |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Submersible to | — | 2 m |
| Impact resistance (drop) | — | 1.5 m |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 143 mm | — |
| Head diameter / width | 34 mm | — |
| Body diameter / depth | 25.4 mm | — |
| Weight | 112 g | 115 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | Dual switches | — |
| Tactical tail switch (momentary on) | Yes | Yes |
| Strobe | Yes | — |
| Mode memory | Yes | — |
| Colours | Black | — |
