- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- TK16 V2.0 vs LD70
Fenix TK16 V2.0 vs Imalent LD70
What TK16 V2.0 does better (4) and where LD70 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
TK16 V2.0LD70
| TK16 V2.0 | LD70 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 143 mm | 81 mm | +62 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 34 mm | 25 mm | +9 mm |
| Weight | 112 g | 87 g | +25 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is TK16 V2.0 better than LD70?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)380 m vs 203 m+87%
- Peak beam intensity36,100 cd vs 10,350 cd3.5×
- Maximum runtime43.3 h vs 15 h2.9×
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 4,000 mAh+25%
Why is LD70 better than TK16 V2.0?
- Maximum output3,100 lm vs 4,000 lm+29%
- Weight112 g vs 87 g+29%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 3,100 lm | 4,000 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 36,100 cd | 10,350 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 380 m | 203 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SST-70 | Cree XHP70 |
| LED maker | Luminus | Cree |
| Number of LEDs | 1 | — |
| Colour temperature | 6,200K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 21700 Li-ion | 18350 Li-ion |
| Number of batteries | 1 | 1 |
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 4,000 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 43.3 h | 15 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | — |
| Magnetic charging | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | — | 1.5 m |
| Impact resistance (drop) | — | 1.5 m |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 143 mm | 81 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 34 mm | 25 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 25.4 mm | — |
| Weight | 112 g | 87 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | Dual switches | — |
| Tactical tail switch (momentary on) | Yes | — |
| Strobe | Yes | — |
| Green / blue / RGB light | — | Yes |
| Mode memory | Yes | — |
| Colours | Black | — |
