- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- TK16 V2.0 vs MH12 Pro
Fenix TK16 V2.0 vs Nitecore MH12 Pro
What TK16 V2.0 does better (0) and where MH12 Pro wins (5) — every spec side by side.
Why is TK16 V2.0 better than MH12 Pro?
TK16 V2.0 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is MH12 Pro better than TK16 V2.0?
- Maximum runtime43.3 h vs 650 h15×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)380 m vs 505 m+33%
- Peak beam intensity36,100 cd vs 63,760 cd+77%
- Maximum output3,100 lm vs 3,300 lm+6%
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 5,300 mAh+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 3,100 lm | 3,300 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 36,100 cd | 63,760 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 380 m | 505 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SST-70 | NiteLab UHi 40 |
| LED maker | Luminus | NiteLab |
| Number of LEDs | 1 | 1 |
| Colour temperature | 6,200K | 5,700K |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 21700 Li-ion | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Number of batteries | 1 | — |
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,300 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 43.3 h | 650 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | — | 2 m |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 143 mm | — |
| Head diameter / width | 34 mm | — |
| Body diameter / depth | 25.4 mm | — |
| Weight | 112 g | — |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | Dual switches | — |
| Tactical tail switch (momentary on) | Yes | — |
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
| SOS / beacon | — | Yes |
| Mode memory | Yes | — |
| Colours | Black | Black |
