How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare1,339 models · updated Nov 13, 2026
  1. compoundsemi.com
  2. Compare
  3. TK16 V2.0 vs Warrior 3S

Fenix TK16 V2.0 vs Olight Warrior 3S

What TK16 V2.0 does better (2) and where Warrior 3S wins (0) — every spec side by side.

Fenix TK16 V2.0
Fenix · 2021TK16 V2.0
8.5Score
2 advantages≈ $100
Higher score
vs
Olight Warrior 3S
Olight · 2022Warrior 3S
0 advantages≈ $90
7.5Brightness & throw6.9

Why is TK16 V2.0 better than Warrior 3S?

  1. Maximum output3,100 lm vs 2,300 lm+35%
  2. Beam distance (ANSI FL1)380 m vs 300 m+27%

Why is Warrior 3S better than TK16 V2.0?

Warrior 3S has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

Fenix TK16 V2.0Fenix TK16 V2.0≈ $1008.5
Light output
Maximum output3,100 lm2,300 lm
Peak beam intensity36,100 cd—
Beam distance (ANSI FL1)380 m300 m
Light sourceLEDLED
LED & beam
LED emitterLuminus SST-70—
LED makerLuminus—
Number of LEDs1—
Colour temperature6,200K—
Battery & charging
Battery21700 Li-ionBuilt-in Li-ion / Li-Po
Number of batteries1—
Battery capacity5,000 mAh—
Maximum runtime43.3 h—
RechargeableYesYes
USB-C chargingYes—
Build & durability
Protection ratingIP68—
Water protection (IPx)IPx8—
Body materialAluminiumAluminium
Size & weight
Length / height143 mm—
Head diameter / width34 mm—
Body diameter / depth25.4 mm—
Weight112 g—
Modes & features
SwitchDual switches—
Tactical tail switch (momentary on)Yes—
StrobeYes—
Mode memoryYes—
ColoursBlack—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare