- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- TK16 V2.0 vs Warrior Mini 2
Fenix TK16 V2.0 vs Olight Warrior Mini 2
What TK16 V2.0 does better (2) and where Warrior Mini 2 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.5Brightness & throw5.9
6.1Battery & charging9.7
8.6Build & durability8.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
TK16 V2.0Warrior Mini 2
| TK16 V2.0 | Warrior Mini 2 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 143 mm | 118 mm | +25 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 34 mm | 25 mm | +9 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is TK16 V2.0 better than Warrior Mini 2?
- Maximum output3,100 lm vs 1,750 lm+77%
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)380 m vs 220 m+73%
Why is Warrior Mini 2 better than TK16 V2.0?
- Maximum runtime43.3 h vs 1,080 h24.9×
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 3,100 lm | 1,750 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 36,100 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 380 m | 220 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SST-70 | — |
| LED maker | Luminus | — |
| Number of LEDs | 1 | — |
| Colour temperature | 6,200K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 21700 Li-ion | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Number of batteries | 1 | — |
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | — |
| Maximum runtime | 43.3 h | 1,080 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Body material | Aluminium | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 143 mm | 118 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 34 mm | 25 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 25.4 mm | — |
| Weight | 112 g | — |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | Dual switches | — |
| Tactical tail switch (momentary on) | Yes | — |
| Strobe | Yes | — |
| Mode memory | Yes | — |
| Colours | Black | — |
