How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare1,338 models · updated Nov 11, 2026
  1. compoundsemi.com
  2. Compare
  3. TK16 V2.0 vs T102

Fenix TK16 V2.0 vs Wuben T102

What TK16 V2.0 does better (0) and where T102 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Fenix TK16 V2.0
Fenix · 2021TK16 V2.0
8.4Score
0 advantages≈ $100
vs
Wuben T102
Wuben · 2019T102
9.3Score
1 advantage≈ $90
Higher score
7.5Brightness & throw8.6
6.1Battery & charging6.1
8.6Build & durability8.2

Why is TK16 V2.0 better than T102?

TK16 V2.0 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is T102 better than TK16 V2.0?

  1. Maximum output3,100 lm vs 3,500 lm+13%
Specifications

Side by side

Fenix TK16 V2.0Fenix TK16 V2.0≈ $1008.4
Wuben T102Wuben T102≈ $909.3
Light output
Maximum output3,100 lm3,500 lm
Peak beam intensity36,100 cd—
Beam distance (ANSI FL1)380 m—
Light sourceLEDLED
LED & beam
LED emitterLuminus SST-70Cree XHP70.2
LED makerLuminusCree
Number of LEDs1—
Colour temperature6,200K—
Battery & charging
Battery21700 Li-ion—
Number of batteries1—
Battery capacity5,000 mAh—
Maximum runtime43.3 h—
RechargeableYesYes
USB-C chargingYesYes
Battery level indicator—Yes
Build & durability
Protection ratingIP68IP68
Water protection (IPx)IPx8IPx8
Body materialAluminiumAluminium
Size & weight
Length / height143 mm—
Head diameter / width34 mm—
Body diameter / depth25.4 mm—
Weight112 g—
Modes & features
SwitchDual switches—
Tactical tail switch (momentary on)Yes—
StrobeYes—
Mode memoryYes—
ColoursBlack—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare