- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- TK22 UE vs UC52
Fenix TK22 UE vs Fenix UC52
What TK22 UE does better (5) and where UC52 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
TK22 UEUC52
| TK22 UE | UC52 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 150 mm | 153.5 mm | −3.5 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 40 mm | 42 mm | −2 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 25.4 mm | 26 mm | −0.6 mm |
| Weight | 150 g | 275 g | −125 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is TK22 UE better than UC52?
- Peak beam intensity41,010 cd vs 16,000 cd2.6×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)405 m vs 253 m+60%
- USB-C chargingYes · UC52: No
- Weight150 g vs 275 g+83%
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 3,500 mAh+43%
Why is UC52 better than TK22 UE?
- Maximum output1,600 lm vs 3,100 lm+94%
- Maximum runtime80 h vs 82.5 h+3%
- Brightness levels4 vs 5+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,600 lm | 3,100 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 41,010 cd | 16,000 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 405 m | 253 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SST-40 | Cree XHP70 |
| LED maker | Luminus | Cree |
| Colour temperature | 6,500K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 21700 Li-ion, 18650 Li-ion | AAA |
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 3,500 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 80 h | 82.5 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | No |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | — | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 150 mm | 153.5 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 40 mm | 42 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 25.4 mm | 26 mm |
| Weight | 150 g | 275 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 4 | 5 |
| Switch | Dual switches | Side switch |
| Tactical tail switch (momentary on) | Yes | — |
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
| SOS / beacon | — | Yes |
| Mode memory | Yes | — |
