- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- TK22 UE vs TA30C
Fenix TK22 UE vs Nextorch TA30C
What TK22 UE does better (3) and where TA30C wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
TK22 UETA30C
| TK22 UE | TA30C | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 150 mm | 136 mm | +14 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 40 mm | 30 mm | +10 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 25.4 mm | 23 mm | +2.4 mm |
| Weight | 150 g | 97 g | +53 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is TK22 UE better than TA30C?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)405 m vs 303 m+34%
- Peak beam intensity41,010 cd vs 22,950 cd+79%
- Maximum runtime80 h vs 50 h+60%
Why is TA30C better than TK22 UE?
- Weight150 g vs 97 g+55%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,600 lm | 1,600 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 41,010 cd | 22,950 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 405 m | 303 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SST-40 | — |
| LED maker | Luminus | — |
| Colour temperature | 6,500K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 21700 Li-ion, 18650 Li-ion | — |
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | — |
| Maximum runtime | 80 h | 50 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | — |
| USB-C charging | Yes | — |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Also runs on AA/AAA/CR123A | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | — | IPX8 |
| Water protection (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | — | 2 m |
| Impact resistance (drop) | — | 2 m |
| Magnetic tail / base | — | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 150 mm | 136 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 40 mm | 30 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 25.4 mm | 23 mm |
| Weight | 150 g | 97 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 4 | — |
| Switch | Dual switches | Tail switch |
| Tactical tail switch (momentary on) | Yes | — |
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
| Mode memory | Yes | — |
