- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- TK25 UV vs UC52
Fenix TK25 UV vs Fenix UC52
What TK25 UV does better (2) and where UC52 wins (4) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
TK25 UVUC52
| TK25 UV | UC52 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 142.6 mm | 153.5 mm | −10.9 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 40 mm | 42 mm | −2 mm |
| Weight | 156 g | 275 g | −119 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is TK25 UV better than UC52?
- Weight156 g vs 275 g+76%
- Maximum runtime110 h vs 82.5 h+33%
Why is UC52 better than TK25 UV?
- Maximum output1,000 lm vs 3,100 lm3.1×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)225 m vs 253 m+12%
- Peak beam intensity12,660 cd vs 16,000 cd+26%
- Brightness levels4 vs 5+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,000 lm | 3,100 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 12,660 cd | 16,000 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 225 m | 253 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Cree XP-G2 | Cree XHP70 |
| LED maker | Cree | Cree |
| Number of LEDs | 2 | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 18650 Li-ion, CR123A | AAA |
| Battery capacity | — | 3,500 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 110 h | 82.5 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | — | No |
| Battery level indicator | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | — | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Pocket clip | Yes | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 142.6 mm | 153.5 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 40 mm | 42 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | — | 26 mm |
| Weight | 156 g | 275 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 4 | 5 |
| Switch | Tail switch | Side switch |
| Tactical tail switch (momentary on) | Yes | — |
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
| SOS / beacon | — | Yes |
| UV light | Yes | — |
| Colours | Black | — |
