- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- TK26R vs TK35
Fenix TK26R vs Fenix TK35
What TK26R does better (3) and where TK35 wins (4) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
TK26RTK35
| TK26R | TK35 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 150 mm | 159.5 mm | −9.5 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 40 mm | 48 mm | −8 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 25.4 mm | 43 mm | −17.6 mm |
| Weight | 156 g | 272 g | −116 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is TK26R better than TK35?
- USB-C chargingYes · TK35: No
- Weight156 g vs 272 g+74%
- Maximum output1,500 lm vs 1,300 lm+15%
Why is TK35 better than TK26R?
- Maximum runtime100 h vs 235 h2.4×
- Peak beam intensity30,620 cd vs 57,600 cd+88%
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)350 m vs 480 m+37%
- Brightness levels4 vs 5+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,500 lm | 1,300 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 30,620 cd | 57,600 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 350 m | 480 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | — | Cree XHP35 HI |
| LED maker | Cree | Cree |
| Colour temperature | 7,100K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 18650 Li-ion, CR123A | 18650 Li-ion, AAA |
| Maximum runtime | 100 h | 235 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | No |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Also runs on AA/AAA/CR123A | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Body material | Aluminium | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 150 mm | 159.5 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 40 mm | 48 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 25.4 mm | 43 mm |
| Weight | 156 g | 272 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 4 | 5 |
| Switch | Dual switches | Dual switches |
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
| SOS / beacon | — | Yes |
| Red light | Yes | — |
| Green / blue / RGB light | Yes | — |
| Mode memory | Yes | — |
