- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- TK26R vs TA30C
Fenix TK26R vs Nextorch TA30C
What TK26R does better (3) and where TA30C wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
TK26RTA30C
| TK26R | TA30C | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 150 mm | 136 mm | +14 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 40 mm | 30 mm | +10 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 25.4 mm | 23 mm | +2.4 mm |
| Weight | 156 g | 97 g | +59 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is TK26R better than TA30C?
- Maximum runtime100 h vs 50 h2×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)350 m vs 303 m+16%
- Peak beam intensity30,620 cd vs 22,950 cd+33%
Why is TA30C better than TK26R?
- Weight156 g vs 97 g+61%
- Maximum output1,500 lm vs 1,600 lm+7%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,500 lm | 1,600 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 30,620 cd | 22,950 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 350 m | 303 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED maker | Cree | — |
| Colour temperature | 7,100K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 18650 Li-ion, CR123A | — |
| Maximum runtime | 100 h | 50 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | — |
| USB-C charging | Yes | — |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Also runs on AA/AAA/CR123A | Yes | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IPX8 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | — | 2 m |
| Impact resistance (drop) | — | 2 m |
| Body material | Aluminium | — |
| Magnetic tail / base | — | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 150 mm | 136 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 40 mm | 30 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 25.4 mm | 23 mm |
| Weight | 156 g | 97 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 4 | — |
| Switch | Dual switches | Tail switch |
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
| Red light | Yes | — |
| Green / blue / RGB light | Yes | — |
| Mode memory | Yes | — |
