How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare791 models · updated Oct 21, 2026
  1. compoundsemi.com
  2. Compare
  3. TK35R vs MH40 Pro

Fenix TK35R vs Nitecore MH40 Pro

What TK35R does better (2) and where MH40 Pro wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Fenix TK35R
Fenix · 2025TK35R
8.8Score
2 advantages≈ $200
Higher score
vs
Nitecore MH40 Pro
Nitecore · 2024MH40 Pro
7.5Score
3 advantages≈ $170
8.8Brightness & throw9.0
7.0Battery & charging8.0
4.9Build & durability4.6
5.9Features5.9

Why is TK35R better than MH40 Pro?

  1. Maximum output5,800 lm vs 3,500 lm+66%
  2. Maximum runtime105 h vs 62 h+69%

Why is MH40 Pro better than TK35R?

  1. Beam distance (ANSI FL1)610 m vs 1,300 m2.1×
  2. Peak beam intensity93,020 cd vs 422,500 cd4.5×
  3. Battery capacity4,000 mAh vs 10,000 mAh2.5×
Specifications

Side by side

Fenix TK35RFenix TK35R≈ $2008.8
Light output
Maximum output5,800 lm3,500 lm
Peak beam intensity93,020 cd422,500 cd
Beam distance (ANSI FL1)610 m1,300 m
Light sourceLEDLED
LED & beam
LED emitterLuminus SFT-25RNiteLab UHi 40 MAX
LED makerLuminusNiteLab
Number of LEDs4—
Colour temperature7,500K—
Battery & charging
Battery18650 Li-ion21700 Li-ion
Battery capacity4,000 mAh10,000 mAh
Maximum runtime105 h62 h
RechargeableYesYes
USB-C chargingYesYes
Battery level indicatorYesYes
Build & durability
Protection ratingIP68IP68
Water protection (IPx)IPx8IPx8
Impact resistance (drop)—1 m
Body materialAluminium—
Size & weight
Length / height154 mm—
Head diameter / width43 mm—
Weight342 g—
Modes & features
Brightness levels—4
SwitchDual switchesRemote pressure switch
StrobeYesYes
SOS / beacon—Yes
Red lightYes—
UV lightYes—
Mode memoryYes—
ColoursBlack—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare