- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- TK35UE Fenix vs Freyr
Fenix TK35UE Fenix vs Olight Freyr
What TK35UE Fenix does better (1) and where Freyr wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.8Brightness & throw6.9
9.0Battery & charging9.6
3.6Build & durability8.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
TK35UE FenixFreyr
| TK35UE Fenix | Freyr | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 164.5 mm | 136 mm | +28.5 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 48 mm | 40 mm | +8 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is TK35UE Fenix better than Freyr?
- Maximum output3,200 lm vs 1,750 lm+83%
Why is Freyr better than TK35UE Fenix?
- Maximum runtime152 h vs 360 h2.4×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)300 m vs 360 m+20%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 3,200 lm | 1,750 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 22,500 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 300 m | 360 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Cree XHP70 | — |
| LED maker | Cree | — |
| Colour temperature | 6,400K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 18650 Li-ion | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Maximum runtime | 152 h | 360 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Water protection (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 164.5 mm | 136 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 48 mm | 40 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 43 mm | — |
| Weight | 286 g | — |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 6 | — |
| Strobe | Yes | — |
| SOS / beacon | Yes | — |
| Lockout | Yes | — |
| Colours | — | Black |
