- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- UC52 vs ML150LR
Fenix UC52 vs Maglite ML150LR
What UC52 does better (3) and where ML150LR wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
UC52ML150LR
| UC52 | ML150LR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 153.5 mm | 270 mm | −116.5 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 42 mm | 50 mm | −8 mm |
| Weight | 275 g | 440 g | −165 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is UC52 better than ML150LR?
- Maximum output3,100 lm vs 1,082 lm2.9×
- Maximum runtime82.5 h vs 3.2 h25.4×
- Weight275 g vs 440 g+60%
Why is ML150LR better than UC52?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)253 m vs 458 m+81%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 3,100 lm | 1,082 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 16,000 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 253 m | 458 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Cree XHP70 | — |
| LED maker | Cree | — |
| Number of LEDs | — | 1 |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | AAA | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Battery capacity | 3,500 mAh | — |
| Maximum runtime | 82.5 h | 3.2 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | No | — |
| Charging time | — | 6 h |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 153.5 mm | 270 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 42 mm | 50 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 26 mm | — |
| Weight | 275 g | 440 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 5 | — |
| Switch | Side switch | — |
| Strobe | Yes | — |
| SOS / beacon | Yes | — |
