- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- UC52 vs T102
Fenix UC52 vs Wuben T102
What UC52 does better (0) and where T102 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Why is UC52 better than T102?
UC52 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is T102 better than UC52?
- USB-C chargingNo · UC52: Yes
- Maximum output3,100 lm vs 3,500 lm+13%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 3,100 lm | 3,500 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 16,000 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 253 m | — |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Cree XHP70 | Cree XHP70.2 |
| LED maker | Cree | Cree |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | AAA | — |
| Battery capacity | 3,500 mAh | — |
| Maximum runtime | 82.5 h | — |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | No | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 153.5 mm | — |
| Head diameter / width | 42 mm | — |
| Body diameter / depth | 26 mm | — |
| Weight | 275 g | — |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 5 | — |
| Switch | Side switch | — |
| Strobe | Yes | — |
| SOS / beacon | Yes | — |
