- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- WF11E Intrinsically Safe vs WT20R Adjustable Angle
Fenix WF11E Intrinsically Safe vs Fenix WT20R Adjustable Angle
What WF11E Intrinsically Safe does better (3) and where WT20R Adjustable Angle wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.9Brightness & throw2.5
3.6Build & durability5.7
2.6Light quality2.6
5.9Features5.9
Why is WF11E Intrinsically Safe better than WT20R Adjustable Angle?
- Peak beam intensity8,560 cd vs 3,420 cd2.5×
- Maximum runtime70 h vs 21 h3.3×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)185 m vs 117 m+58%
Why is WT20R Adjustable Angle better than WF11E Intrinsically Safe?
- Maximum output200 lm vs 400 lm2×
- Weight159 g vs 153 g+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 200 lm | 400 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 8,560 cd | 3,420 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 185 m | 117 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Cree XP-G2 | — |
| LED maker | Cree | Cree |
| Number of LEDs | — | 2 |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | AA | AAA, AA |
| Battery capacity | — | 2,000 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 70 h | 21 h |
| Rechargeable | — | Yes |
| USB-C charging | — | No |
| Battery level indicator | — | Yes |
| Also runs on AA/AAA/CR123A | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP67 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx7 | — |
| Impact resistance (drop) | 1 m | — |
| Magnetic tail / base | Yes | Yes |
| Pocket clip | Yes | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 167.5 mm | — |
| Head diameter / width | 49 mm | — |
| Body diameter / depth | 24 mm | — |
| Weight | 159 g | 153 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 3 | 3 |
| Switch | — | Side switch |
Related comparisons
vs
Fenix WF11E Intrinsically SafevsLedlenser P7 Core4.04.0vs
Fenix WF11E Intrinsically SafevsLedlenser i9 CRI4.03.7vs
Fenix WF11E Intrinsically SafevsMaglite ML300LX-S20164.04.1vs
Fenix WF11E Intrinsically SafevsWuben T103 Provs
Fenix WF11E Intrinsically SafevsWuben TO46R4.04.0
vsFenix WT20R Adjustable AnglevsLedlenser P7 Core4.14.0