- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- WF11E Intrinsically Safe vs i9 CRI
Fenix WF11E Intrinsically Safe vs Ledlenser i9 CRI
What WF11E Intrinsically Safe does better (3) and where i9 CRI wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.9Brightness & throw3.3
3.6Build & durability2.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
WF11E Intrinsically Safei9 CRI
| WF11E Intrinsically Safe | i9 CRI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 167.5 mm | 187 mm | −19.5 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 49 mm | 39 mm | +10 mm |
| Weight | 159 g | 312 g | −153 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is WF11E Intrinsically Safe better than i9 CRI?
- Maximum runtime70 h vs 25 h2.8×
- Weight159 g vs 312 g+96%
- Water protection (IPx)IPx7 vs IPx4+75%
Why is i9 CRI better than WF11E Intrinsically Safe?
- Maximum output200 lm vs 300 lm+50%
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)185 m vs 240 m+30%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 200 lm | 300 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 8,560 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 185 m | 240 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Cree XP-G2 | — |
| LED maker | Cree | — |
| Number of LEDs | — | 1 |
| Colour temperature | — | 4,000K |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | AA | C |
| Number of batteries | — | 2 |
| Maximum runtime | 70 h | 25 h |
| Rechargeable | — | No |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP67 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx7 | IPx4 |
| Impact resistance (drop) | 1 m | — |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Magnetic tail / base | Yes | — |
| Pocket clip | Yes | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 167.5 mm | 187 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 49 mm | 39 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 24 mm | — |
| Weight | 159 g | 312 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 3 | — |
| Colours | — | Black |
