How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare791 models · updated Oct 21, 2026
  1. compoundsemi.com
  2. Compare
  3. WF11E Intrinsically Safe vs ML300LX-S2016

Fenix WF11E Intrinsically Safe vs Maglite ML300LX-S2016

What WF11E Intrinsically Safe does better (2) and where ML300LX-S2016 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Fenix WF11E Intrinsically Safe
4.0Score
2 advantages≈ $60
vs
Maglite ML300LX-S2016
Maglite · 2019ML300LX-S2016
4.1Score
2 advantages≈ $80
Higher score
2.9Brightness & throw4.6
3.6Build & durability2.3
2.6Light quality5.5
Dimensions

Size comparison

WF11E Intrinsically SafeML300LX-S2016
49 × 167.52457 × 230
WF11E Intrinsically SafeML300LX-S2016Difference
Length / height167.5 mm230 mm−62.5 mm
Head diameter / width49 mm57 mm−8 mm
Weight159 g566 g−407 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is WF11E Intrinsically Safe better than ML300LX-S2016?

  1. Weight159 g vs 566 g3.6×
  2. Water protection (IPx)IPx7 vs IPx4+75%

Why is ML300LX-S2016 better than WF11E Intrinsically Safe?

  1. Maximum output200 lm vs 524 lm2.6×
  2. Beam distance (ANSI FL1)185 m vs 366 m+98%
Specifications

Side by side

Light output
Maximum output200 lm524 lm
Peak beam intensity8,560 cd—
Beam distance (ANSI FL1)185 m366 m
Light sourceLEDLED
Adjustable focus (zoom)—Yes
LED & beam
LED emitterCree XP-G2—
LED makerCree—
Battery & charging
BatteryAAD
Number of batteries—2
Maximum runtime70 h69 h
Build & durability
Protection ratingIP67—
Water protection (IPx)IPx7IPx4
Impact resistance (drop)1 m—
Body material—Aluminium
Magnetic tail / baseYes—
Pocket clipYes—
Size & weight
Length / height167.5 mm230 mm
Head diameter / width49 mm57 mm
Body diameter / depth24 mm—
Weight159 g566 g
Modes & features
Brightness levels3—
Colours—Black
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare