How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare1,338 models · updated Nov 10, 2026
  1. compoundsemi.com
  2. Compare
  3. WF11E Intrinsically Safe vs PL-850-300lm 312208

Fenix WF11E Intrinsically Safe vs IVT PL-850-300lm 312208

What WF11E Intrinsically Safe does better (0) and where PL-850-300lm 312208 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Fenix WF11E Intrinsically Safe
4.3Score
0 advantages≈ $60
Higher score
vs
IVT PL-850-300lm 312208
1 advantage≈ $60
3.4Brightness & throw3.2

Why is WF11E Intrinsically Safe better than PL-850-300lm 312208?

WF11E Intrinsically Safe has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is PL-850-300lm 312208 better than WF11E Intrinsically Safe?

  1. Maximum output200 lm vs 300 lm+50%
Specifications

Side by side

Light output
Maximum output200 lm300 lm
Peak beam intensity8,560 cd—
Beam distance (ANSI FL1)185 m—
Light sourceLEDLED
LED & beam
LED emitterCree XP-G2—
LED makerCree—
Battery & charging
BatteryAABuilt-in Li-ion / Li-Po
Maximum runtime70 h—
Rechargeable—Yes
Build & durability
Protection ratingIP67—
Water protection (IPx)IPx7—
Impact resistance (drop)1 m—
Magnetic tail / baseYes—
Pocket clipYes—
Size & weight
Length / height167.5 mm—
Head diameter / width49 mm—
Body diameter / depth24 mm—
Weight159 g—
Modes & features
Brightness levels3—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare