- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- WF11E Intrinsically Safe vs P5R
Fenix WF11E Intrinsically Safe vs Ledlenser P5R
What WF11E Intrinsically Safe does better (2) and where P5R wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.4Brightness & throw3.5
4.2Build & durability6.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
WF11E Intrinsically SafeP5R
| WF11E Intrinsically Safe | P5R | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 167.5 mm | 130 mm | +37.5 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 49 mm | 22 mm | +27 mm |
| Weight | 159 g | 124 g | +35 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is WF11E Intrinsically Safe better than P5R?
- Maximum runtime70 h vs 25 h2.8×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)185 m vs 165 m+12%
Why is P5R better than WF11E Intrinsically Safe?
- Maximum output200 lm vs 320 lm+60%
- Weight159 g vs 124 g+28%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 200 lm | 320 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 8,560 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 185 m | 165 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Cree XP-G2 | — |
| LED maker | Cree | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | AA | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Number of batteries | — | 1 |
| Maximum runtime | 70 h | 25 h |
| Rechargeable | — | Yes |
| Charging time | — | 2 h |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP67 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx7 | — |
| Impact resistance (drop) | 1 m | — |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Magnetic tail / base | Yes | — |
| Pocket clip | Yes | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 167.5 mm | 130 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 49 mm | 22 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 24 mm | — |
| Weight | 159 g | 124 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 3 | — |
| Colours | — | Black |
