How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare1,338 models · updated Nov 10, 2026
  1. compoundsemi.com
  2. Compare
  3. WF11E Intrinsically Safe vs ML25L

Fenix WF11E Intrinsically Safe vs Maglite ML25L

What WF11E Intrinsically Safe does better (3) and where ML25L wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Fenix WF11E Intrinsically Safe
4.3Score
3 advantages≈ $60
vs
Maglite ML25L
Maglite · 2022ML25L
5.0Score
2 advantages≈ $55
Higher score
3.4Brightness & throw4.6
4.2Build & durability3.2
Dimensions

Size comparison

WF11E Intrinsically SafeML25L
49 × 167.52443 × 168
WF11E Intrinsically SafeML25LDifference
Length / height167.5 mm168 mm−0.5 mm
Head diameter / width49 mm43 mm+6 mm
Weight159 g317 g−158 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is WF11E Intrinsically Safe better than ML25L?

  1. Weight159 g vs 317 g+99%
  2. Water protection (IPx)IPx7 vs IPx4+75%
  3. Maximum output200 lm vs 192 lm+4%

Why is ML25L better than WF11E Intrinsically Safe?

  1. Beam distance (ANSI FL1)185 m vs 337 m+82%
  2. Maximum runtime70 h vs 72 h+3%
Specifications

Side by side

Maglite ML25LMaglite ML25L≈ $555.0
Light output
Maximum output200 lm192 lm
Peak beam intensity8,560 cd—
Beam distance (ANSI FL1)185 m337 m
Light sourceLEDLED
LED & beam
LED emitterCree XP-G2—
LED makerCree—
Battery & charging
BatteryAABuilt-in Li-ion / Li-Po
Maximum runtime70 h72 h
Rechargeable—Yes
Build & durability
Protection ratingIP67—
Water protection (IPx)IPx7IPx4
Impact resistance (drop)1 m—
Body material—Aluminium
Magnetic tail / baseYes—
Pocket clipYes—
Size & weight
Length / height167.5 mm168 mm
Head diameter / width49 mm43 mm
Body diameter / depth24 mm—
Weight159 g317 g
Modes & features
Brightness levels3—
Colours—Black
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare