- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- WF11E Intrinsically Safe vs E12R
Fenix WF11E Intrinsically Safe vs Wuben E12R
What WF11E Intrinsically Safe does better (2) and where E12R wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.9Brightness & throw3.4
3.6Build & durability9.5
5.9Features5.9
Why is WF11E Intrinsically Safe better than E12R?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)185 m vs 179 m+3%
- Peak beam intensity8,560 cd vs 8,010 cd+7%
Why is E12R better than WF11E Intrinsically Safe?
- Maximum output200 lm vs 1,200 lm6×
- Maximum runtime70 h vs 173 h2.5×
- Weight159 g vs 92 g+73%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 200 lm | 1,200 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 8,560 cd | 8,010 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 185 m | 179 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Cree XP-G2 | Osram P9 |
| LED maker | Cree | Osram |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | AA | 18650 Li-ion |
| Battery capacity | — | 3,400 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 70 h | 173 h |
| Rechargeable | — | Yes |
| Power bank function | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP67 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx7 | — |
| Impact resistance (drop) | 1 m | — |
| Magnetic tail / base | Yes | — |
| Pocket clip | Yes | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 167.5 mm | — |
| Head diameter / width | 49 mm | — |
| Body diameter / depth | 24 mm | — |
| Weight | 159 g | 92 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 3 | — |
| Strobe | — | Yes |
| SOS / beacon | — | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Fenix WF11E Intrinsically SafevsLedlenser P7 Core4.04.0vs
Fenix WF11E Intrinsically SafevsLedlenser i9 CRI4.03.7vs
Fenix WF11E Intrinsically SafevsMaglite ML300LX-S20164.04.1vs
Fenix WF11E Intrinsically SafevsWuben T103 Provs
Fenix WF11E Intrinsically SafevsWuben TO46R4.04.0
vs
Wuben E12RvsUK Underwater Kinetics eLED RFL UK