- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- WF30RE Intrinsically Safe vs MH10 V2.0
Fenix WF30RE Intrinsically Safe vs Nitecore MH10 V2.0
What WF30RE Intrinsically Safe does better (0) and where MH10 V2.0 wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.3Brightness & throw5.2
9.3Battery & charging9.7
6.2Build & durability8.7
5.9Features5.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
WF30RE Intrinsically SafeMH10 V2.0
| WF30RE Intrinsically Safe | MH10 V2.0 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 150.5 mm | 130 mm | +20.5 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 34 mm | 25 mm | +9 mm |
| Weight | 215 g | 75 g | +140 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is WF30RE Intrinsically Safe better than MH10 V2.0?
WF30RE Intrinsically Safe has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is MH10 V2.0 better than WF30RE Intrinsically Safe?
- Maximum output280 lm vs 1,000 lm3.6×
- Maximum runtime120 h vs 520 h4.3×
- Weight215 g vs 75 g2.9×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)170 m vs 232 m+36%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 280 lm | 1,000 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 7,220 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 170 m | 232 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Cree XP-G2 | — |
| LED maker | Cree | — |
| Colour temperature | 4,800K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po | 18650 Li-ion, CR123A |
| Maximum runtime | 120 h | 520 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | — | 2 m |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 150.5 mm | 130 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 34 mm | 25 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 28 mm | — |
| Weight | 215 g | 75 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 3 | — |
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
| SOS / beacon | — | Yes |
| Colours | — | Black |
